Comments on: Statement against statementlessness

By: vallu

vallu — Wed, 17 Jan 2007 12:59:41 +0000

Maybe an infrequent profound statement could be considered pure? Then again, I wonder if frequent infrequent statements should be considered frequent or infrequent?

If we define frequent as + and infrequent as -, then frequent * infrequent is equal to infrequent.

So we can conclude that an infrequent statement is pure provided that frequencies follow basic math rules. Since frequencies are taught at physics classes, I would think they do.

By: Tero P

Tero P — Mon, 27 Nov 2006 08:50:29 +0000

So these two choices are exclusive? It’s not possible to state something profound and stay pure despite?

By: komu

komu — Fri, 24 Nov 2006 19:33:20 +0000

I was going to state something profound, but then I realized that it’s better to stay pure.