Statement against statementlessness

Making it short: the Society is against statement-providing communities, which fail to provide statements frequently.

3 Responses to “Statement against statementlessness”

  1. komu Says:

    I was going to state something profound, but then I realized that it’s better to stay pure.

  2. Tero P Says:

    So these two choices are exclusive? It’s not possible to state something profound and stay pure despite?

  3. vallu Says:

    Maybe an infrequent profound statement could be considered pure? Then again, I wonder if frequent infrequent statements should be considered frequent or infrequent?

    If we define frequent as + and infrequent as -, then frequent * infrequent is equal to infrequent.

    So we can conclude that an infrequent statement is pure provided that frequencies follow basic math rules. Since frequencies are taught at physics classes, I would think they do.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.