Hidden truth of FBS?
The Friday Bun Society hereby wants to announce that we have lately been very worried about the nature of the Friday Bun Society. There are rumours about some well-hidden signs, which might be indicating that the Society is actually very close to being a carefully planned pyramid scam. Also, a keen observer may well be able to spot marks of cultism within the Society. The FBS wants to make clear that we will follow this issue with great interest.
October 12th, 2005 at 20:03
What an uncomfortable silentness has your statement created. I wonder why.
October 12th, 2005 at 20:28
Yes, it’s really strange. After all, your thorough investigation (http://fridaybunsociety.org/forum/viewtopic.php?t=6) did prove that the Society has absolutely nothing to do with cultism. Maybe the silence is caused by the exceptionally warm weather for this time of the year.
October 15th, 2005 at 18:24
Just a minor sidenote: it was not my investigation, it was secretly conducted by an anonymous and faceless investigator. I can take all the credit for it, though, since if the anonymous and faceless investigator took credit for it, he wouldn’t be anonymous and faceless any more, right?
October 30th, 2005 at 21:07
Don’t you try to take my credit!
November 2nd, 2005 at 23:08
I feel sorry for this anonymous and faceless investigator. I think we should show our gratitude and give him some compensation for the brilliant investigation. (I’m assuming it’s a ‘he’.)
And what would an anonymous and faceless investigator need the most? A name and a face! We could name him Dennis, for instance. Then we could do some fund-raising and pay for the plastic surgery to give this poor bastard some decent appearance.
November 3rd, 2005 at 09:06
I see a potential identity crisis here. What if the investigator happens to be a mature woman who wears grandma-like clothes, and we name him Dennis? Would he consider himself as a man from then on? Now, if someone who does not know this Dennis (let’s call this person Arthur, for example) would happen to pass by, it would be so easy to get things confused:
Arthur: Old woman.
Dennis: Man.
Arthur: Man, sorry.
Dennis: I’m 37.
Arthur: What?
Dennis: I’m 37. I’m not old.
Arthur: Well I can’t just call you “man”.
Dennis: Well you could say “Dennis”.
Arthur: I didn’t know you were called Dennis.
Dennis: Well you didn’t bother to find out did you?
Arthur: I did say sorry about the “old woman”, but from behind you looked…
Dennis: What I object to is you automatically treat me like an inferior.
… so we already have here a potential fight breaking out. Not that this kind of conversation could ever happen anywhere, of course, just as a theoretical example.
November 7th, 2005 at 00:57
I am sorry but from the anonymous and faceless investigator’s point of view the above plans sound just horrible. I mean, first trying hard to get into the point where nobody knows your name or face and then BANG – people start to call you Dennis. Can you imagine fate worse than this? That’s like denying a well-earned bun from a hungry Founder.
November 10th, 2005 at 17:03
I didn’t realize we were playing Bang! here. Luckily I happened to have a Mancato! card in my hand.
Oh, I need a birra.
November 10th, 2005 at 21:43
Ok, I’ll play “Indians”.
November 11th, 2005 at 11:38
I don’t know how to play.